One thing to mention real quick about the colored list, just for my kind of perspective and take on it. When I first saw color because I was like, wow, that's a really beautiful because it did turn what articles are black and white and do something where you look at them and they're just, they're quite striking. I'm kind of torn because in my head it would have been one thing. Like you like I'm cool with derivative projects as long as they're inspired by and not just clones of right? And the color glyphs they were clones, but they added color but I think their heart was in the right place. That they were they coded the contract with the intention of giving them to the original owners. There was an exploit that happened and then that obviously the the it did not roll out as intended, you know, you have these now that they're sitting at a floor price of 5 .9 eith for the color glyphs. They're also quite old at this point on the grand scheme of nft. Are these came out a while ago. I don't know. Do you ever see there being any collectability? I mean, there isn't a sense that there's a hundred forty nine. Owners today that are holding a floor price of 5/8 or six Eve. That's not nothing, but you just feel like you would not want to any of your existing Auto glyph members are fingerprints members. Do they hold any of these colored list, you know. Well, I know DC does but maybe a few of them, dude. I never did my view on color glyphs was at some point. Stop tracking the market, but at some point there were like five percent of the price of water or Olive and I mean, it doesn't make sense to me. Would you pay if you have a Picasso and you have derivative Picasso, it should cost like a hundred times less, if not more, like, maybe, 200 300, so it still feels overpriced English. When I look at this proportion. Okay. There's this thing that people seem to care a lot about all. This is a very old project and I think there's some Merit to that and I also think that this idea what you mention about the intentionality is important. So the idea was to be very legit in that sense, and there was an exploit I don't find them particularly appealing from a static or perspective. So I wouldn't personally collect and from the Dow standpoint. I don't think they had a lot from the artistic perspective as well. Like, from glyphs itself something where it's a derivative, but it actually brings a new component. And you artistic component could be more interesting than simply adding color. But I think it's fun. Like people can collect some people like shoe match. There are a glyph for their color glyph. It's fine. It's fine. I wouldn't necessarily in on a relative basis. I feel they like either or gloves or underpriced or color glyphs or yeah for prize. So, in the relatives, it's a interesting project. It is a head-scratcher because I the only saving grace I have there is that I feel like they were trying to do the right thing. But, yeah, and this counts. I think I think intentionality is very important when we are in a early stage kind of environment, so, mistakes happen. So, yeah, I've seen some crypto Punk's projects, where they They just move the punks to another chain and I'm like, that is not cool. But that doesn't mean derivative. You don't understand. And also I think like the there's a lot of overlap in the people who I think that this does not happen at all with Solana punctures. Right? Right.