the

done eye-tracking whenever you comparing reading in a book and reading on a screen and when you read on a screen you just skim like you're kind of just you're like a hunter like looking for bit just sort of big piece of information and once you get it you move on and with a book you're more likely just to read the whole thing through

right? So yeah, there's a the eye-tracking studies show that we read on a screen we read in an F pattern, which means we kind of are Our eyes go across the first couple of lines of text all the way and then it we drift down the left margin then go about halfway across then just drift down the left margin and continued to drift down the left margin and then click and go out and I want to say that there's nothing wrong with skimming and scanning even in printed text. I mean, I mean think of how we used to read still some of us do printed newspapers. It's not like we're reading every article in depth with total attentiveness. There's all sorts of skimming. Scanning going on the difference though. Is that skimming and scanning becomes the dominant form of reading on a computer screen because there's so much going on and so many distractions. So we rarely give ourselves the operative in the opportunity to get lost in a text to really engage in deep reading there are many ways to read and they're all very very important. The problem with the computer screen is it steals from us both the practice of it? The encouragement to engage in really attentive contemplative deep-rooted